Journal cover Journal topic
Ocean Science An interactive open-access journal of the European Geosciences Union

Journal metrics

  • IF value: 2.985 IF 2.985
  • IF 5-year<br/> value: 2.790 IF 5-year
  • CiteScore<br/> value: 2.70 CiteScore
  • SNIP value: 1.191 SNIP 1.191
  • SJR value: 1.885 SJR 1.885
  • IPP value: 2.589 IPP 2.589
  • h5-index value: 25 h5-index 25
Ocean Sci., 8, 567-586, 2012
© Author(s) 2012. This work is distributed
under the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.
Research article
06 Aug 2012
In situ determination of the remote sensing reflectance: an inter-comparison
G. Zibordi1, K. Ruddick2, I. Ansko3, G. Moore4, S. Kratzer5, J. Icely6, and A. Reinart3 1Institute for Environment and Sustainability, Joint Research Centre, Ispra, Italy
2Royal Belgian Institute of Natural Sciences, Management Unit of the North Sea Mathematical Models, Brussels, Belgium
3Tartu Observatory, Estonia
4Bio-Optika, Crofters, Middle Dimson, Gunnislake, UK
5Stockholm University, Department of Systems Ecology, Sweden
6Sagremarisco Lda, Vila do Bispo, Portugal
Abstract. Inter-comparison of data products from simultaneous measurements performed with independent systems and methods is a viable approach to assess the consistency of data and additionally to investigate uncertainties. Within such a context the inter-comparison called Assessment of In Situ Radiometric Capabilities for Coastal Water Remote Sensing Applications (ARC) was carried out at the Acqua Alta Oceanographic Tower in the northern Adriatic Sea to explore the accuracy of in situ data products from various in- and above-water optical systems and methods. Measurements were performed under almost ideal conditions, including a stable deployment platform, clear sky, relatively low sun zenith angles and moderately low sea state. Additionally, all optical sensors involved in the experiment were inter-calibrated through absolute radiometric calibration performed with the same standards and methods. Inter-compared data products include spectral water-leaving radiance Lw (λ), above-water downward irradiance Ed(0+,λ) and remote sensing reflectance Rrs(λ). Data products from the various measurement systems/methods were directly compared to those from a single reference system/method. Results for Rrs(λ) indicate spectrally averaged values of relative differences comprised between −1 and +6%, while spectrally averaged values of absolute differences vary from approximately 6% for the above-water systems/methods to 9% for buoy-based systems/methods. The agreement between Rrs(λ) spectral relative differences and estimates of combined uncertainties of the inter-compared systems/methods is noteworthy.

Citation: Zibordi, G., Ruddick, K., Ansko, I., Moore, G., Kratzer, S., Icely, J., and Reinart, A.: In situ determination of the remote sensing reflectance: an inter-comparison, Ocean Sci., 8, 567-586, doi:10.5194/os-8-567-2012, 2012.
Publications Copernicus